“The ignorance of one official impairs on the security of all but the mandate of a vaccination is the loss of democratic freedom of everyone”


Covid-19 Security Assessment Report: Ref # 0605021TSD

Although the COVID threat is not completely dissipated, the global covid-19 case numbers are down significantly and are continuing to decline internationally however, Covid-19 related death related to Vaccination is up and more than double than that of those non injected with the Covid Flu jab that only lasts 8 months. The importance is that most people who get COVID have mild to no symptom that leads the question if there is any inflated pandemic. The mortality rate is only half a percent compared to the forecast of the WHO World Health Organization of 2.4% and it’s ten times less than that for people without other health conditions to risk factors.

There are significant and legitimate bioethical concerns about mandating the COVID vaccines because there’s growing international evidence that the relatively low benefits of the vaccines are not significantly outweighed by the associated risks of death by vaccination and other. Despite many medical experts testifying that statistically the COVID vaccines are, quote, “The most dangerous vaccines ever created,” unquote, because their adverse incident rate is nearly twice the rate of other diseases should be a real wakeup call for failing governments that clearly ignores the fact that the vaccines are unnecessary for persons who have previously had COVID because they have natural immunity.

Therefore by rule of International Law: any European government imposing vaccination mandates are unlawful and/or unconstitutional and by enforcing any citizen or residence in the EU with any form of injection of any and/or prototype vaccine in EU without consent of the person(s) and/or subjects, and or minor(s) is an act of war crime and a direct violation of Geneva Convention1949, more specific the Geneva Protocol, which concerns biological and chemical warfare. Article 3 relating to non-international armed conflict. There are two criteria to distinguish non-international armed conflicts from lower forms of violence and thus the Fourth Geneva Convention “relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War” (first adopted in 1949, based on parts of the Hague Convention (II) of 1899 and Hague Convention (IV) 1907) apply.

To this end, the following acts are and shall remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever with respect to the above-mentioned persons:

1) violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture;
2) taking of hostages;
3) outrages upon dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment; and
4) The passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples.

Recalling resolutions of the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations 1074 D (XXXIX) of 28 July 1965 and 1158 (XLI) of 5 August 1966 on the punishment of war criminals and of persons who have committed crimes against humanity,

Furthermore we bring attention to the subject of: Inchoate Crimes The word ‘‘inchoate’’ denotes something that has ‘‘just begun’’ or is ‘‘underdeveloped’’, ‘‘partially completed’’ or ‘‘imperfectly formed’’. Inchoate offences are thus incomplete offences, which are deemed to have been committed despite the fact that the substantive offence, that is, the offence whose commission they were aiming at, is not completed and the intended harm is not realized.

In short the WHO World Health Organization has played a major role in the creation of incitement on International level and caused great harm and instability to global population and governments by creating and inchoate a form of Global Incitement without examining the true consequences of their actions by announcing a “Pandemic” without enough evidence that led to many, national lockdowns, economical losses and vaccination deaths by allowing the use of unapproved vaccinations and promoting thereof.

We reference, both the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) have addressed instigation into “Incitement” – provided for in Article 7(1) of the ICTY Statute and Article 6(1) of the ICTR Statute, which lists forms of individual criminal responsibility – in several cases. Thus criminal responsibility in creating incitement as an offence on both National and International Level must be addressed via an the International Criminal Tribunal Europe ICTE to avoid further experimental deaths using the vaccinations that’s harmful and can lead to death of citizens.

Article 1:

(b) Crimes against humanity whether committed in time of war or in time of peace as they are defined in the Charter of the International Military Tribunal, Nürnberg, of 8 August 1945 and confirmed by resolutions 3 (I) of 13 February 1946 and 95 (I) of 11 December 1946 of the General Assembly of the United Nations, eviction by armed attack or occupation and inhuman acts resulting from the policy of apartheid , and the crime of genocide as defined in the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, even if such acts do not constitute a violation of the domestic law of the country in which they were committed.

It’s therefore that ECIPS notify:

Any state or government that enforces a mandatory vaccination without the consent of those to be vaccinated is in breach of Geneva Convention1949, the Geneva protocol and the Hague Convention (II) of 1899 and Hague Convention (IV) 1907) apply. Recalling resolutions of the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations 1074 D (XXXIX) of 28 July 1965 and 1158 (XLI) of 5 August 1966 on the punishment of war criminals and of persons who have committed crimes against humanity will apply. ECIPS mandate Art. 2

Article 2(bis) §1 to §19 of the ECIPS Decree Title of the Code Approved by Royal Decree no WL 22/16.594 constitutes the activities of ECIPS organization by Federal Approval dated 14 June 2015.

Art. 2 §9 To monitor open source investigative publications and document trends and identification of early signs of changes in the global climate of atmospherics to act as a “Global Watchdog”